White fragility: It is difficult for eggs to talk about racism

Upon its release in 2018, this book was a reason for division between the opponents of racism from the American white, who described themselves as far from ethical discrimination. The discontent of some blacks who considered that the writer believes in a white possiba that she understood their feeling of racism. Rather, there are those who described the book as racist despite the intentions of his sincere author. Robin Dianglo - specialized in analyzing critical discourse, whiteness studies and diversity consultant - formulated the term (white fragility) to express a system of social, cultural and psychological policies and motives, preventing white from recognizing their hidden and void racism forms and practices. (White fragility) has become at the top of the list of best -selling books in the New York Times following the protests that followed the death of George Floyd, as used by various American universities and institutions in building a self -criticism project to look at home, and examines racist biases that many barely know that they are practicing. And if the book appears on its appearance dedicated to white liberalism, then in every society you believe is that &quote;progressive white&quote; segment that opposes the forms of bias, intolerance and discrimination on the surface. Without realizing that it is one of the reasons for its continuity at the same time. You, while reading this book, can replace the word racism with gender or class; You will find that many of what Dianglo proposes applies to other forms of intolerance and discrimination.